William Sanchez-Barrera and UEF Celina Acevedo WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIACELINA ACEVEDO, Applicant,vs.WILLIAM SANCHEZ-BARRERA and UEF, Defendants.Case No. ADJ6688237 (Oakland District Office)ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION We have considered the allegations of the Petition for Reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record, and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will deny reconsideration. We are, moreover, extending to the WCJ’s finding on credibility the great weight to which it is entitled (see Garza v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1970) 3 Cal. 3d 312, 35 Cal. Comp. Cases 500)./ / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / // / / , For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that said Petition for Reconsideration be, and it hereby is, DENIED.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD_________________________________________MARGUERITE SWEENEYI CONCUR,_________________________________________ ALFONSO J. MORESI_________________________________________ FRANK M. BRASSDATED AND FILED AT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA JUN 10 2013SERVICE MADE ON THE ABOVE DATE ON THE PERSONS LISTED BELOW AT THEIR ADDRESSES SHOWN ON THE CURRENT OFFICIAL ADDRESS RECORD.CELINA ACEVEDOLAW OFFICES OF KELLEY BURGLAW OFFICES OF RICHARD MACBRIDEOD LEGAL OAKLANDebe , WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIACelina Acevedo, Applicantvs.William Sanchez-Barrera and UEF, DefendantLILLA J. RADOSWORKER’S COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGEADJ 6688237REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION Applicant filed a timely petition for reconsideration from my Findings of Fact, Opinion on Decision of 03/28/2013, finding that applicant was not an employee of William Sanchez-Barrera. To date no response has been filed to the petition for reconsi
