Carrita Morales vs. County Of Riverside, Department Of Public Health

This case is about a worker, Carrita Morales, who was injured while employed as a clerk on December 18, 2006. The employer accepted the injury but disputed injury to some of the body parts. The worker filed an Application for Adjudication of Claim on July 11, 2008. The defendant filed an untimely, verified Petition for Removal, requesting that the Appeals Board reverse the Order dated May 25, 2011, wherein the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) took the case off calendar and ordered discovery reopened. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition but removed the matter to themselves on their own motion. The case was returned to the trial level to be set for Mandatory Settlement Conference and for such further proceedings and decisions by the WCJ

County Of Riverside, Department Of Public Health Carrita Morales WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIACARRITA MORALES, Applicant,vs.COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Defendants.Case No. ADJ3157778 (SBR 0342745)OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR REMOVAL AND GRANTING REMOVAL ON OWN MOTION AND DECISION AFTER REMOVAL            Defendant has filed an untimely, verified Petition for Removal, requesting that the Appeals Board reverse the Order dated May 25, 2011, wherein the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) took the case off calendar and ordered discovery reopened. The WCJ stated: “Parties and WCJ had extensive discussions. Court finds primary treating physician Ghazal’s permanent and stationary [report] of 2007 needs supplement-he has not seen the sleep report which states insomnia needs to be addressed, which applicant attempted to do with another sleep evaluation, for which authorization was denied as duplicative. Also, Dr. Ghazal states fracture is completely healed, but has ordered new injection and physical therapy based on complaints he finds are the same as time of P&S. Discovery is reopened to complete the record. PTP may be deposed. He will be provided with the sleep report for comment re whether a referral by PTP is in order on that issue. Parties may seek panel QME for sleep in interim, which may be cancelled if PTP makes referral. PTP will also review applicant’s depo transcript. Applicant did object to trial setting at MSC and new reporting received since MSC for pre-MSC exam does appear to be a change in status, which needs to be addressed. Defendant’s motion to proceed on present record is denied. Discovery is reopened and matter is ordered off calendar.”            Defendant contends that applicant failed to object to defendant’s Declaration of Readiness to Proceed dated October 6, 2009; that applicant did not object to the findings of the treating physician; and7 that applicant has not exercise

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.