MLB Investments dba B&E Feed & Supply; Truck Insurance Exchange Carlos Urrea WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIACARLOS URREA, Applicant,vs.MLB INVESTMENTS dba B&E FEED & SUPPLY; TRUCK INSURANCEEXCHANGE, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ3897698 (ANA 0370975)OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION ANDDECISION AFTER RECONSIDERATION Applicant seeks reconsideration of the Findings and Order of November 16, 2009, in which the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found that applicant sustained industrial injury to his low back on or about January 22, 2002, that applicant did not sustain industrial injury as a result of the self-procured back surgery that occurred on December 3, 2003, that the surgery was not a compensable consequence of the industrial injury of January 22, 2002, and that the spinal surgery performed by Dr. Fonseca was neither reasonable nor necessary to cure or relieve the effects of the industrial injury. Pursuant to these findings, the WCJ ordered that defendant is not liable for any of the costs associated with the low back surgery performed by Dr. Fonseca, and that defendant is not liable for surgery to remove hardware placed in applicant’s back at the time of surgery on January 22, 2002. Applicant contends that the medical opinion of Dr. Feiwell, the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), supports a finding that applicant is entitled to removal of the hardware, that Dr. Fonseca’s alleged malpractice is irrelevant to the issue of whether defendant is liable for removal of the hardware, that defendant is liable for consequences of treatment received by an injured worker for an industrial injury, and that the fact that the surgery performed by Dr. Fonseca was unnecessary does not excuse defendant from liability for subsequent treatment. , Defendant filed an answer.- The WCJ submitted a Report and Recommendation, which we do not adopt or incorporate except for its description of the following stipulated facts:
Carlos Urrea vs. Mlb Investments Dba B&e Feed & Supply; Truck Insurance Exchange
MLB Investments dba B&E Feed & Supply; Truck Insurance Exchange were sued by Carlos Urrea for workers' compensation benefits. The WCJ found that Urrea sustained an industrial injury to his low back on January 22, 2002, but that the self-procured back surgery on December 3, 2003 was not a compensable consequence of the industrial injury. The WCJ also found that the surgery was neither reasonable nor necessary to cure or relieve the effects of the industrial injury. The WCJ ordered that defendant is not liable for any of the costs associated with the low back surgery performed by Dr. Fonseca, and that defendant is not liable for surgery to remove hardware placed in applicant's back at the time of surgery on January 22
- Filed On:
- Court: California, Santa Ana
- Case No. ADJ3897698
To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days
Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!
Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.