Volt Service; Specialty Risk Services Bairo Reynoso WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIABAIRO REYNOSO, Applicant,vs.VOLT SERVICE; SPECIALTY RISKSERVICES, Defendants.Case Nos. ADJ2151255 (LAO 0804906)OPINION AND ORDERS DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING REMOVAL AND DECISION AFTER REMOVAL Defendant seeks reconsideration and removal of the Order setting trial issued by a workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) on November 26, 2012 at a mandatory settlement conference (MSC), wherein the WCJ bifurcated the home health care lien and set the case in chief for trial. Applicant, while employed on November 30, 2001 as a janitor, sustained admitted industrial injury to his back, neck, and right shoulder, and claims injury to his psyche, internal, sleep, hypertension, GERD, erectile dysfunction, and diabetes. Defendant contends that the WCJ erred in setting the case in chief for trial, arguing that it has not had the opportunity to complete the deposition of applicant’s wife who has provided applicant with home health care. Defendant also contends that the reports of the medical examiners are stale and that the doctors should have been able to review the additional surveillance films taken by defendant. We have considered the Petition for Reconsideration and we have reviewed the record in this matter. Applicant filed an Answer. The WCJ has filed a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Removal, recommending that the Petition be denied. Based on our review of the record and for the reasons stated herein, we will dismiss the Petition for Reconsideration because the November 26, 2012 Order setting trial is not a final order. We will also grant removal, rescind the November 26, 2012 Order, and order the matter off calendar. , FACTS Applicant, while employed on November 30, 2001 as a janitor, sustained admitted industrial injury to his back, neck, and right shoulder, and cl
Bairo Reynoso vs. Volt Service; Specialty Risk Services
(LAO 0804906)In this case, Bairo Reynoso, an applicant, was injured while employed as a janitor on November 30, 2001. He sustained admitted industrial injury to his back, neck, and right shoulder, and claimed injury to other body parts. The parties agreed to utilize agreed medical examiners (AMEs) in orthopedics, internal, and psyche. Defendant obtained surveillance film in 2010 which was reviewed by the AMEs. At a mandatory settlement conference (MSC) on November 26, 2012, the WCJ bifurcated the home health care lien and set the case in chief for trial. Defendant sought reconsideration and removal of the Order, arguing that it had not had the opportunity
- Filed On:
- Court: California, Los Angeles
- Case No. ADJ2151255
To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days
Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!
Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.