Antonio Cerda vs. Jacoby Landscape Management; Everest National Insurance Company; California Insurance Guarantee Association, On Behalf Of Fremont Compensation, In Liquidation

This case involves two claims of industrial injury incurred by Antonio Cerda while working for Jacoby Landscape Management. The first alleged specific injury on November 1, 1999, and the second alleged cumulative trauma injury during the period February 2, 2001 through February 2, 2002. The California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) and Everest National Insurance Company (Everest) entered into a stipulation in 2004 wherein CIGA agreed to reimburse Everest a portion of the medical-legal and treatment expenses it incurred. In 2008, Antonio Cerda settled his claims by compromise and release. CIGA sought to be relieved of its liability under the 2004 stipulation, claiming that the language in the 2008 compromise and release constituted a new agreement between it and Everest

Jacoby Landscape Management; Everest National Insurance Company; California Insurance Guarantee Association, On Behalf Of Fremont Compensation, In Liquidation Antonio Cerda WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAANTONIO CERDA, Applicant,vs.JACOBY LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, on behalf of FREMONT COMPENSATION, in liquidation, Defendant.Case Nos. ADJ4695782; ADJ1423613OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION            Defendant, California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), seeks reconsideration of the May 12, 2010 Joint Findings and Award of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) who found, in pertinent part, that CIGA is bound by the March 23, 2004 stipulation it made with defendant Everest National Insurance Company (Everest) wherein it agreed to reimburse Everest 50% of medical-legal and 60% of treatment costs incurred in these cases, and notwithstanding language included in the subsequent July 30, 2008 compromise and release agreement wherein applicant settled the claims of specific industrial injury to various body parts on November 1, 1999, and of industrial injury to those body parts during the cumulative trauma period through February 8, 2002, for a lump sum payment of S 140,000.            CIGA contends that language included in the July 30, 2008 compromise and release superseded its earlier March 23, 2004 agreement with Everest, and that the WCJ should have found that the 2008 language relieved it of all liability for medical-legal and treatment costs incurred by Everest. ,             An answer was received from Everest and the WCJ provided a Report and Recommendation on Petition for Reconsideration (Report) recommending that CIGA’s petition for reconsideration be denied. For the reasons given by the WCJ in his Report, which is incorporated by this reference, and for the reasons below, we deny reconsideration. The July 30, 2008 j compromise and release with app

To continue reading ... start a FREE Trial for 10 days

Discover the cases you didn’t know you were missing!

Copyright © 2023 - CompFox Inc.