California State University Fullerton; And Sedgwick Claims Management Services Amy Christine Lentine WORKERS-COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDSTATE OF CALIFORNIAAMY CHRISTINE LENTINE, Applicant,vs.CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FULLERTON; and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Defendant(s).Case No. ADJ6770647OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RECONSIDERATION AND DECISION AFTER We have considered the allegations of the petition for reconsideration and the contents of the report of the workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) with respect thereto. Based on our review of the record and for the reasons stated in said report which we adopt and incorporate, we will grant reconsideration, affirm the finding that applicant’s claim is not barred by the statute of limitations, amend the WCJ’s May 28. 2010 decision to defer the issue of industrial injury, and remand the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings and decision on the injury issue and any other issues that may hereafter arise.For the foregoing reasons,IT IS ORDERED that reconsideration of the decision of May 28, 20)0, is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as the Decision After Reconsideration of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, the decision of May 28, 2010, is AFFIRMED, EXCEPT that Findings of Fact No. 1 is AMENDED as follows: “1. The issue of whether applicant, Amy Christine Eentine, sustained cumulative injury from April 25, 2007 to and including October 3. 2007 to her psyche, teeth, jaws and in the form of sleep disturbance while employed as a graduate senior evaluator by California State University Fullerton, legally uninsured and administered by Sedgwick Claims Management Services, is deferred. , IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the workers’ compensation administrative law judge for all further proceedings and decisions, including on the issue of industrial injury.WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD________________________________________DEIDRA E. LOWEI CONC
