CompFox AI Summary
Plaintiff Doyle Thornton Teno, III, filed an action against defendants Steve Mead, Leslie Mead, Steve Emert, and Myron Iwanski. Plaintiff alleged violations of 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103 and 7431 for inspecting and disclosing his confidential tax information (IRS Forms W-2 and 1099), and for invasion of privacy under Tennessee common law. The defendants, some of whom hold positions within Anderson County, Tennessee, allegedly used this tax information in a mayoral primary election campaign. The court dismissed the federal claims against all defendants with prejudice, finding that the Meads and Emert did not fall within the categories of persons liable under Section 6103(a), and Iwanski's roles did not meet the criteria for liability. The state-law claims were dismissed without prejudice, as the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after dismissing all federal claims.
Teno v. Iwanski is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, E.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, E.D. Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Plaintiff Doyle Thornton Teno, III, filed an action against defendants Steve Mead, Leslie Mead, Steve Emert, and Myron Iwanski. Plaintiff alleged violations of 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103 and 7431 for inspecting and disclosing his confidential tax information (IRS Forms W-2 and 1099), and for invasion of privacy under Tennessee common law. The defendants, some of whom hold positions within Anderson County, Tennessee, allegedly used this tax information in a mayoral primary election campaign. The court dismissed the federal claims against all defendants with prejudice, finding that the Meads and Emert did not fall within the categories of persons liable under Section 6103(a), and Iwanski's roles did not meet the criteria for liability. The state-law claims were dismissed without prejudice, as the court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction after dismissing all federal claims.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.