Home/Case Law/State v. Howington
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

State v. Howington

Tennessee Supreme Court
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

David Edward Howington entered into an informal immunity agreement with the district attorney general, promising truthful testimony in exchange for a recommendation for a reduced charge of second-degree murder. The prosecutor subsequently refused to honor the agreement, alleging Howington lied about the amount of money received, leading to his conviction for first-degree felony murder. On appeal, the Tennessee Supreme Court addressed the enforceability of such informal agreements. The Court held that these agreements are contractual in nature and judicially enforceable, explicitly overruling Bruno v. State. It found that Howington had substantially fulfilled his obligations, and any alleged untruthfulness was immaterial. Consequently, the Court reversed the first-degree murder conviction, entered judgment for second-degree murder, and remanded the case for resentencing.

State v. Howington is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

David Edward Howington entered into an informal immunity agreement with the district attorney general, promising truthful testimony in exchange for a recommendation for a reduced charge of second-degree murder. The prosecutor subsequently refused to honor the agreement, alleging Howington lied about the amount of money received, leading to his conviction for first-degree felony murder. On appeal, the Tennessee Supreme Court addressed the enforceability of such informal agreements. The Court held that these agreements are contractual in nature and judicially enforceable, explicitly overruling Bruno v. State. It found that Howington had substantially fulfilled his obligations, and any alleged untruthfulness was immaterial. Consequently, the Court reversed the first-degree murder conviction, entered judgment for second-degree murder, and remanded the case for resentencing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

State v. Howington workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

State v. Howington case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

State v. Howington Case Analysis

State v. Howington is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.