Home/Case Law/Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin

Filed: May 15, 1991
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
3-90-149-CV

CompFox AI Summary

Robert E. Wright appealed a district court judgment that set aside an Industrial Accident Board award for workers' compensation benefits. Wright allegedly sustained an injury on June 7, 1988, while in the course and scope of his employment with the City of Austin. The jury found that Wright did not receive a job-related injury, and the trial court rendered judgment on the verdict against him. Wright argued on appeal that the jury's failure to find a job-related injury was so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust. However, the appellate court noted that Wright failed to file a motion for new trial, which is a prerequisite for raising factual sufficiency challenges on appeal. Consequently, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment.

Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Robert E. Wright appealed a district court judgment that set aside an Industrial Accident Board award for workers' compensation benefits. Wright allegedly sustained an injury on June 7, 1988, while in the course and scope of his employment with the City of Austin. The jury found that Wright did not receive a job-related injury, and the trial court rendered judgment on the verdict against him. Wright argued on appeal that the jury's failure to find a job-related injury was so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly unjust. However, the appellate court noted that Wright failed to file a motion for new trial, which is a prerequisite for raising factual sufficiency challenges on appeal. Consequently, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin Case Analysis

Robert E. Wright v. City of Austin is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.