Home/Case Law/Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAppeal by Permission

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D.

Filed: Oct 05, 2022
Tennessee Supreme Court
M2021-01193-SC-R11-CV

CompFox AI Summary

The case is an interlocutory appeal regarding a health care liability action against Dr. Mark Flora. The Supreme Court of Tennessee addressed two pretrial orders. First, it affirmed the trial court's exclusion of evidence suggesting a nonparty physician, Dr. Mitchell Wiatrak, was the cause-in-fact of the claimant's injuries, as Dr. Flora failed to amend his answer to plead comparative fault under Rule 8.03. Second, the Court affirmed the trial court's ruling that Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-119 does not abrogate the common law collateral source rule in this instance, allowing the plaintiffs to present evidence of full, undiscounted medical expenses. The Court declined to overturn its precedent in George v. Alexander and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D. is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Supreme Court.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The case is an interlocutory appeal regarding a health care liability action against Dr. Mark Flora. The Supreme Court of Tennessee addressed two pretrial orders. First, it affirmed the trial court's exclusion of evidence suggesting a nonparty physician, Dr. Mitchell Wiatrak, was the cause-in-fact of the claimant's injuries, as Dr. Flora failed to amend his answer to plead comparative fault under Rule 8.03. Second, the Court affirmed the trial court's ruling that Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-26-119 does not abrogate the common law collateral source rule in this instance, allowing the plaintiffs to present evidence of full, undiscounted medical expenses. The Court declined to overturn its precedent in George v. Alexander and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D. workers compensation case in Tennessee Supreme Court. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D. case law summary from Tennessee Supreme Court. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D. Case Analysis

Robert Crotty v. Mark Flora, M.D. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Supreme Court. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.