CompFox AI Summary
Matt Clevinger appealed the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Fluor Daniel Services Corp., his former employer. Clevinger filed a lawsuit alleging workers' compensation wrongful termination after he was injured and subsequently terminated. Fluor asserted Clevinger's termination was due to a Reduction of Force, a legitimate non-discriminatory reason. The appellate court found Clevinger failed to provide sufficient evidence of a retaliatory motive or a causal link between his workers' compensation claim and his termination. Consequently, the Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment.
Matt Clevinger v. Fluor Daniel Services Corp. is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Matt Clevinger appealed the trial court's order granting summary judgment to Fluor Daniel Services Corp., his former employer. Clevinger filed a lawsuit alleging workers' compensation wrongful termination after he was injured and subsequently terminated. Fluor asserted Clevinger's termination was due to a "Reduction of Force," a legitimate non-discriminatory reason. The appellate court found Clevinger failed to provide sufficient evidence of a retaliatory motive or a causal link between his workers' compensation claim and his termination. Consequently, the Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.