Home/Case Law/John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiff L. R. Keaton, an employee of River Products Company, was severely injured on August 31, 1927, when a heavy 'bucking bar' fell from a pier and struck him while he was working below. The incident, which resulted in a fractured left shoulder blade and three ribs, occurred at a construction site where the defendant, John Bouchard & Sons Company, was working as an independent contractor. A lower court awarded Keaton $1000, but the defendant appealed, citing assumed risk and lack of actionable negligence. The appellate court, while acknowledging the applicability of res ipsa loquitur, ultimately found that Keaton had voluntarily assumed the known dangers of his work position. Consequently, the appellate court reversed the circuit court's judgment, set aside the jury's verdict, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit.

John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiff L. R. Keaton, an employee of River Products Company, was severely injured on August 31, 1927, when a heavy 'bucking bar' fell from a pier and struck him while he was working below. The incident, which resulted in a fractured left shoulder blade and three ribs, occurred at a construction site where the defendant, John Bouchard & Sons Company, was working as an independent contractor. A lower court awarded Keaton $1000, but the defendant appealed, citing assumed risk and lack of actionable negligence. The appellate court, while acknowledging the applicability of res ipsa loquitur, ultimately found that Keaton had voluntarily assumed the known dangers of his work position. Consequently, the appellate court reversed the circuit court's judgment, set aside the jury's verdict, and dismissed the plaintiff's suit.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton Case Analysis

John Bouchard & Sons Co. v. Keaton is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.