Home/Case Law/in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong
Regular Panel Decision DecisionOriginal Proceeding - Opinion on Rehearing

in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong

Filed: Jul 03, 2003
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
2-02-016-CV

CompFox AI Summary

Matthew T. Hinterlong, the relator, sought mandamus relief against a trial court's order denying his motion to compel discovery of a student informant's identity. The informant's tip led to Hinterlong's expulsion from Arlington Martin High School (AMHS) for alleged alcohol possession. Hinterlong contended that the crime stoppers privilege did not apply or was unconstitutional as applied. The Court of Appeals determined that while the AMHS program qualified as a crime stoppers organization and the tip was privileged, the absolute application of the privilege in this civil case violated the Texas Constitution's open courts provision, especially given Hinterlong's acquittal and prima facie evidence of being 'set up'. Consequently, the court conditionally granted the mandamus, directing the trial court to conduct an in camera review of the tipster's information under Texas Rule of Evidence 508 to balance anonymity with Hinterlong's right to redress.

in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Matthew T. Hinterlong, the relator, sought mandamus relief against a trial court's order denying his motion to compel discovery of a student informant's identity. The informant's tip led to Hinterlong's expulsion from Arlington Martin High School (AMHS) for alleged alcohol possession. Hinterlong contended that the crime stoppers privilege did not apply or was unconstitutional as applied. The Court of Appeals determined that while the AMHS program qualified as a crime stoppers organization and the tip was privileged, the absolute application of the privilege in this civil case violated the Texas Constitution's open courts provision, especially given Hinterlong's acquittal and prima facie evidence of being 'set up'. Consequently, the court conditionally granted the mandamus, directing the trial court to conduct an in camera review of the tipster's information under Texas Rule of Evidence 508 to balance anonymity with Hinterlong's right to redress.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong Case Analysis

in Re Matthew T. Hinterlong is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.