In Re Austin W.

This case involves the termination of Kelsey W.'s parental rights to his son, Austin W. The trial court found clear and convincing evidence for four grounds of termination, including abandonment by an incarcerated parent, wanton disregard for the child's welfare, persistent conditions, and failure to manifest an ability and willingness to parent, and determined termination was in the child's best interest. Kelsey W. appealed, challenging only the best interest finding. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, reiterating that all four grounds were proven and that termination was in Austin's best interest, citing the father's long history of incarceration, drug abuse, criminal activity, and consistent failure to support or provide a stable environment for the child.

In Re Austin W. is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.