CompFox AI Summary
The father appealed the trial court's order setting child support, finding him in contempt for unpaid medical bills and late support, and awarding attorney's fees to the mother. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, including its refusal to deduct a business loss from the father's income due to insufficient proof of reasonable expenses. The court also upheld the upward deviation in child support based on the father's lack of visitation. Additionally, the finding of contempt and the award of attorney's fees to the mother were affirmed. The case was affirmed and remanded.
Howard v. Howard is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The father appealed the trial court's order setting child support, finding him in contempt for unpaid medical bills and late support, and awarding attorney's fees to the mother. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision, including its refusal to deduct a business loss from the father's income due to insufficient proof of reasonable expenses. The court also upheld the upward deviation in child support based on the father's lack of visitation. Additionally, the finding of contempt and the award of attorney's fees to the mother were affirmed. The case was affirmed and remanded.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.