Home/Case Law/EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC
Regular Panel Decision DecisionExpedited Hearing Order

EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC

Filed: Dec 18, 2025
Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
2022-04-0223

CompFox AI Summary

Daniel Eicholtz, an employee, suffered a calcaneus fracture and tendon tear in his right foot and ankle from a work-related fall. His authorized treating physician, Dr. Chase Corn, referred him for a psychiatric evaluation due to his reported anxiety and depression and concerning behavior. The employer, RAE Builders, LLC, disputed the need for psychiatric care, arguing Dr. Corn did not explicitly link the psychiatric issues to the work injury. Citing legal precedent from Beech v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc., the Court ruled that the authorized physician's referral for psychiatric care, even without a definitive causation opinion, triggers the presumption of medical necessity. Therefore, the Court granted Mr. Eicholtz's request, ordering RAE Builders to provide a panel of psychiatrists.

EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC is a workers' compensation case decided in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Daniel Eicholtz, an employee, suffered a calcaneus fracture and tendon tear in his right foot and ankle from a work-related fall. His authorized treating physician, Dr. Chase Corn, referred him for a psychiatric evaluation due to his reported anxiety and depression and concerning behavior. The employer, RAE Builders, LLC, disputed the need for psychiatric care, arguing Dr. Corn did not explicitly link the psychiatric issues to the work injury. Citing legal precedent from Beech v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc., the Court ruled that the authorized physician's referral for psychiatric care, even without a definitive causation opinion, triggers the presumption of medical necessity. Therefore, the Court granted Mr. Eicholtz's request, ordering RAE Builders to provide a panel of psychiatrists.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC workers compensation case in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC case law summary from Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC Case Analysis

EICHOLTZ, DANIEL v. RAE BUILDERS, LLC is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.