CompFox AI Summary
Carrie Mildred Mayer Dube (Wife) sued Michael Norman Dube (Husband) for divorce. The Trial Court awarded Wife 65% of the marital property, permanent alimony of $3,200 per month, and child support based on Husband's income. Husband appealed these decisions, challenging the property division, the permanent alimony award, and the child support calculation. The appellate court affirmed the Trial Court's judgment on all issues. It found the property division equitable, the permanent alimony justified due to Wife's limited rehabilitation potential, and the child support determination valid, noting future adjustments could be made if Husband's income changes.
Dube v. Dube is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Carrie Mildred Mayer Dube ("Wife") sued Michael Norman Dube ("Husband") for divorce. The Trial Court awarded Wife 65% of the marital property, permanent alimony of $3,200 per month, and child support based on Husband's income. Husband appealed these decisions, challenging the property division, the permanent alimony award, and the child support calculation. The appellate court affirmed the Trial Court's judgment on all issues. It found the property division equitable, the permanent alimony justified due to Wife's limited rehabilitation potential, and the child support determination valid, noting future adjustments could be made if Husband's income changes.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.