CompFox AI Summary
Dolores Agripino appealed her convictions for Practicing Medicine Without a License (PMWL) and Aggravated Assault. Following a jury trial, she was found guilty of injecting mineral oil, falsely advertised as low-cost collagen, into over twenty women, primarily in their breasts and buttocks. Victims suffered severe pain, lumps, discoloration, and disfigurement, often requiring multiple surgeries. Agripino argued the evidence was legally and factually insufficient for her convictions and that the indictment was vague. The Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions, ruling that there was sufficient evidence that she charged money for services, that her actions constituted practicing medicine, and that she acted with conscious disregard of the risk of harm, thereby satisfying the recklessness element for aggravated assault.
Dolores Agripino v. State is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Dolores Agripino appealed her convictions for Practicing Medicine Without a License (PMWL) and Aggravated Assault. Following a jury trial, she was found guilty of injecting mineral oil, falsely advertised as low-cost collagen, into over twenty women, primarily in their breasts and buttocks. Victims suffered severe pain, lumps, discoloration, and disfigurement, often requiring multiple surgeries. Agripino argued the evidence was legally and factually insufficient for her convictions and that the indictment was vague. The Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions, ruling that there was sufficient evidence that she charged money for services, that her actions constituted practicing medicine, and that she acted with conscious disregard of the risk of harm, thereby satisfying the recklessness element for aggravated assault.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.