Home/Case Law/Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAppellate Opinion

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Plaintiffs Thomas G. Daniels and his wife Orna P. Daniels appealed an adverse jury verdict in their products liability lawsuit against multiple manufacturers of asbestos-related insulation materials, including Combustion Engineering, Inc. Mr. Daniels, an insulation installer, contracted asbestosis from working with the defendants' products. The plaintiffs contended the products were defective and unreasonably dangerous due to design flaws, hazardous asbestos content, and inadequate warnings. The jury found in favor of the defendants, and the trial court's judgment was affirmed on appeal, which addressed issues like the admissibility of cancer testimony, depositions from a deceased medical director, and jury instructions on 'unavoidably unsafe products' and 'state of the art' defense.

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Plaintiffs Thomas G. Daniels and his wife Orna P. Daniels appealed an adverse jury verdict in their products liability lawsuit against multiple manufacturers of asbestos-related insulation materials, including Combustion Engineering, Inc. Mr. Daniels, an insulation installer, contracted asbestosis from working with the defendants' products. The plaintiffs contended the products were defective and unreasonably dangerous due to design flaws, hazardous asbestos content, and inadequate warnings. The jury found in favor of the defendants, and the trial court's judgment was affirmed on appeal, which addressed issues like the admissibility of cancer testimony, depositions from a deceased medical director, and jury instructions on 'unavoidably unsafe products' and 'state of the art' defense.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. case law summary from Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. Case Analysis

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.