Home/Case Law/Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Floyd W. Daigle, an employee of Phillips 66, sued Phillips Petroleum Company for negligence after developing post-traumatic stress disorder following a plant explosion in Pasadena, Texas. Daigle, a fire brigade member, reported to the plant and engaged in first aid, fire fighting, and body search and rescue. Phillips obtained summary judgment, arguing no general duty to avoid negligent infliction of emotional distress per Boyles v. Kerr. The appellate court reversed, asserting that Boyles did not preclude emotional distress claims stemming from other legal duties, specifically applying the rescue doctrine in this case. The court found sufficient evidence to raise fact issues regarding the rescue doctrine's applicability, thus precluding summary judgment and remanding for a trial on the merits.

Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston).

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Floyd W. Daigle, an employee of Phillips 66, sued Phillips Petroleum Company for negligence after developing post-traumatic stress disorder following a plant explosion in Pasadena, Texas. Daigle, a fire brigade member, reported to the plant and engaged in first aid, fire fighting, and body search and rescue. Phillips obtained summary judgment, arguing no general duty to avoid negligent infliction of emotional distress per Boyles v. Kerr. The appellate court reversed, asserting that Boyles did not preclude emotional distress claims stemming from other legal duties, specifically applying the rescue doctrine in this case. The court found sufficient evidence to raise fact issues regarding the rescue doctrine's applicability, thus precluding summary judgment and remanding for a trial on the merits.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co. workers compensation case in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co. case law summary from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co. Case Analysis

Daigle v. Phillips Petroleum Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston). This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.