CompFox AI Summary
This appeal arises from a breach of contract action filed by C.R. Batts Construction, LLC against 101 Construction Company for unpaid services related to a subcontract for site preparation. The initial dispute stemmed from disagreements over the quantity of rock excavated and the subsequent payments. The trial court found in favor of C.R. Batts, awarding damages of $24,260.11 along with pre-judgment interest. The defendants, 101 Construction and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, appealed this decision, challenging the evidentiary support for the award and the discretion used in granting pre-judgment interest. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, upholding its implicit factual findings and its discretion in awarding interest, concluding that the evidence did not preponderate against these findings.
C.R. Batts Const. v. 101 Construction Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Tennessee.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This appeal arises from a breach of contract action filed by C.R. Batts Construction, LLC against 101 Construction Company for unpaid services related to a subcontract for site preparation. The initial dispute stemmed from disagreements over the quantity of rock excavated and the subsequent payments. The trial court found in favor of C.R. Batts, awarding damages of $24,260.11 along with pre-judgment interest. The defendants, 101 Construction and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, appealed this decision, challenging the evidentiary support for the award and the discretion used in granting pre-judgment interest. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment, upholding its implicit factual findings and its discretion in awarding interest, concluding that the evidence did not preponderate against these findings.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.