Home/Case Law/Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionMotion to Reconsider Summary Judgment

Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Jeffrey Paul Bailey filed suit against Gator Hawk, Inc. for damages allegedly sustained while working on an offshore drill site. Gator Hawk moved for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of Jones Act claims, limiting recovery to LHWCA, and dismissing Champlin Petroleum Company's cross-claim. The Court previously denied summary judgment but allowed Gator Hawk to re-urge the motion. This Memorandum and Order addresses Gator Hawk's Motion to Reconsider Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court determined that Bailey did not qualify as a seaman under the Jones Act, based on the Fifth Circuit's 'Robison' criteria, as he spent less than 10% of his work time on vessels and was not permanently assigned to an identifiable fleet. Consequently, summary judgment was granted for Gator Hawk on the Jones Act claim, dismissing Bailey's claims under 46 U.S.C.App. § 688. Decisions regarding Bailey's status under LHWCA and Champlin's cross-claim were reserved pending further briefing.

Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, S.D. Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, S.D. Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Jeffrey Paul Bailey filed suit against Gator Hawk, Inc. for damages allegedly sustained while working on an offshore drill site. Gator Hawk moved for summary judgment, seeking dismissal of Jones Act claims, limiting recovery to LHWCA, and dismissing Champlin Petroleum Company's cross-claim. The Court previously denied summary judgment but allowed Gator Hawk to re-urge the motion. This Memorandum and Order addresses Gator Hawk's Motion to Reconsider Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court determined that Bailey did not qualify as a seaman under the Jones Act, based on the Fifth Circuit's 'Robison' criteria, as he spent less than 10% of his work time on vessels and was not permanently assigned to an identifiable fleet. Consequently, summary judgment was granted for Gator Hawk on the Jones Act claim, dismissing Bailey's claims under 46 U.S.C.App. § 688. Decisions regarding Bailey's status under LHWCA and Champlin's cross-claim were reserved pending further briefing.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc. workers compensation case in District Court, S.D. Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc. case law summary from District Court, S.D. Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc. Case Analysis

Bailey v. Global Marine, Inc. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, S.D. Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.